Application security audit
Secure code review, authentication and authorisation checks, exposed secrets and vulnerable dependency detection. Checks are selected based on project risks and the OWASP Top 10.
.NET · Azure · API · DevSecOps
Protect your applications, APIs and Azure environments with focused technical audits and help fixing vulnerabilities.
Understand the code. Prioritise risks. Fix the root cause.
A new API, changed user permissions or an Azure migration can expose data or business functions. A targeted audit helps understand risks before deployment, when taking over an application or after architecture changes.
We work with SMEs, software vendors and technical teams that need clear findings and a plan for fixing vulnerabilities. We agree on the scope based on the code and environments available and the resources needed.
Secure code review, authentication and authorisation checks, exposed secrets and vulnerable dependency detection. Checks are selected based on project risks and the OWASP Top 10.
REST API and API Management review: OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, JWT validation, resource-level permissions, endpoint protection, rate limiting and data validation.
We review Entra ID, permissions and access to resources, including Key Vault, managed identities, Azure Functions and API Management. Network settings, private access, logs and monitoring are reviewed within the agreed scope.
Integrate static application security testing (SAST), software composition analysis (SCA) for open-source dependencies, and secret detection into Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions. Review CI/CD permissions, triage alerts and help remediate findings. Tools are selected during scoping.
We review C# and ASP.NET Core code, including authorisation, input validation, secrets, dependencies and sensitive business logic. We also review data access, including Entity Framework where the project uses it.
Fix code, harden configuration and update dependencies. Validate fixes and add automated checks to reduce regressions.
A technical partner who understands your code, your cloud and your security challenges.
Our C# / .NET expertise helps trace a finding to its cause: an incomplete authorisation policy, access to another user’s resource, unchecked input or a secret in a configuration file. We also review business rules that automated tools may miss.
We explain risk conditions, propose a fix compatible with the architecture and define regression tests with your team. Explore our development expertise →
We trace a request’s journey: Entra ID identity, the token presented to the API, resource authorisation, Azure Functions execution and Key Vault secret access. This end-to-end view helps identify gaps between the intended architecture and deployed configuration.
Private access, permissions and logs are reviewed within the authorised resources. Logs should support diagnosis without exposing tokens or sensitive data. Our Cloud & integration services →
We review the architecture, objectives, permissions and scope. Environments, test accounts, testing windows, exclusions and conditions for stopping work are agreed in writing.
We review the relevant code, configuration, dependencies, identities and entry points. Any active testing requires explicit authorisation.
We assess findings by severity, exploitability and business impact, explaining false positives and the limits of verification.
We document the findings, supporting technical evidence and associated risks, with recommendations for fixes in order of priority.
Where agreed, we implement fixes, support your developers and verify the changes. We record any remaining risks and items that have not been retested.
All work is performed only within a client-authorised scope. Third-party systems also require their owner’s authorisation. Destructive or availability testing is not included by default.
Our audit practices and verification criteria →
Scope, limitations, key risks and priorities explained to project owners.
Assessed findings, affected components, redacted evidence, authorised reproduction conditions and recommendations.
Prioritised actions and validation criteria, plus code or configuration fixes and verification results where included in the engagement.
Once a problem is identified, the next step is fixing it.
We can work with your developers to fix vulnerable code, restrict permissions, remove secrets from configuration or update dependencies. Changes follow your review and deployment process.
Verifying fixes and adding CI/CD checks turns the report into lasting improvements. The proposal clearly separates the audit, remediation work and verification.
The service focuses on targeted technical reviews of code, configuration, APIs and pipelines. Active tests, when needed, require specific scope and authorisation. A targeted audit does not automatically cover the entire IT system.
Code review requires limited access to agreed repositories. An Azure configuration review can be scoped separately. Required access and its duration are defined before starting.
No. Conclusions apply to the scope, versions and conditions observed. Limitations and unverified items are included in the report.
Timing and cost depend on the size of the codebase, architecture, available access and checks selected. After scoping, we provide a proposal setting out the work and deliverables.
Audits can be organised remotely for businesses in France, including Lyon and Villeurbanne. Any on-site work is agreed during scoping; the registered office is in Paris.
Describe your need and the review’s objective. This form prepares an email in your email application: nothing is sent automatically.
Describe only the general context. Do not enter passwords, API keys, source code, third-party personal data or sensitive documents. Scope and authorisations will be defined before any engagement.
You can also email us directly: contact@inobic.fr.
Information received by email is used to handle your enquiry. Read the website privacy policy.
See how we improved the security of our own website: configuration changes, HTTP checks on the live site and form tests. The documented case study is accompanied by a separate .NET learning lab.
View the technical evidence →